[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: New schema
At 10:15 AM 4/27/99 +0200, Julio Sánchez Fernández wrote:
>> How about we add them to servers/slapd/schema?
Hopefully many prying eyes will help find any typos. Also,
I am sure Julio would welcome help entering in additional
well-defined, commonly-used schema items. Please coordinate
>> I'm am not sure how best to organize the information in files.
>> I do think we should separate items by source. Hence, I think
>> we should have a separate file per source:
I think we need some organization of the schema items that facilates
local specification of schema. I think there are certain items
that are required by either standard or implementation (such as
for cn=config/cn=monitor). Collectively these could be considered
include openldap-core.schema # required implementation specific items
include standard.schema # schema items required by standard
I think all schema items described (or referenced) in RFC2251-6,
RFC2247 and RFC2377.
(Yes, I now rfc-2247 is informational... maybe standard.schema is
a bad choice... maybe ldap-core.schema would be better.)
Past this, other schema files would be optional, including:
inetOrgPerson.schema (latest draft)
>For the time being, I have commited standard.schema, pilot.schema
>and misc.schema. Umich and nadf/fips things are on hold.
I think we should deprecate these items as being either
1) not well defined,
2) not commonly used, or
- Re: New schema
- From: "Larry S. Bartz" <email@example.com>