[Date Prev][Date Next]
> > However, the server implementer can give the server administrator config
> > choices to select just what behavior is desired, e.g...
> > [hypothetical slapd.conf or equivalent]
> > - speak with [ v2 | v3 | v2&v3 ] clients.
> > - do UMich-style v2 referrals [ yes | no ]
> > - assume client who queries w/o binding a v3 client [ yes | no ]
> Hmmm. I don't think that last option should be included. The RFC is
> pretty clear on that one (section 4, 2251):
> ... If a client has not sent
> a bind, the server MUST assume that version 3 is supported in the
> client (since version 2 required that the client bind first).
Yep, I agree. The implementation should follow the standard. I was just
shooting from the hip when I wrote that.