[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: struct ldap empty
In article <Pine.BSF.email@example.com>,
James FitzGibbon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>I think that OpenLDAP, if it wants to avoid driving developers crazy, is
>going to have to walk a thin line between adding features and maintaining
>API compatibility with the UMich build. This will be the situation until
>somone publishes a book that describes the OpenLDAP API, or until OpenLDAP
Well there is a draft rfc for the C API.
The problem is that there are a lot of developers using the older two
API's (UMich and Netscape) because a) they where available and b) they where
documented in the only book available on the subject.
I think we need to continue to support one or the other to keep that old
code base working until we have a new API finished.
I don't mind fixing my clients once, I just don't want it to be a continous
process trying to track a moving target.
Stuart Lynne <email@example.com> 604-461-7532 <http://www.fireplug.net>
PGP Fingerprint: 28 E2 A0 15 99 62 9A 00 88 EC A3 EE 2D 1C 15 68