[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#6798) Mutex starvation on two-level referral for SASL connection

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="VicgVXOp2ABP8hIiqjm4ijIANjXR7KCdV";
From: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com>
To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>, openldap-its@openldap.org,
 Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4b76c423-a4c3-9fc7-64e2-883388b3e65f@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: (ITS#6798) Mutex starvation on two-level referral for SASL
References: <D6162EF94C4315CF6F656712@[]>
In-Reply-To: <838E0287ACCF76C2266EC803@[]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US

On 05/10/2017 01:13 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 2:09 PM -0400 Stephen Gallagher
> <sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, I'm not sure why you're directing this at me? I've not been
>> involved with this bug at all.
> Hi Stephen,
> I'm not sure what you mean by "not involved".  You are the one who
> filed the bug report with us.  Here is a direct link for a refresher:
> <http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=3D6798>

In your previous email, you sent me the ITS number 8648. I missed that
this was in reference to 6798 which I filed in 2011.

I'm not sure if we still have a reproducer; I think we gave up years ago
on using the built-in referral tracking of libldap. I'm CCing Jakub
Hrozek who is the current tech lead on SSSD to see if he can still
reproduce the issue.


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"