[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: (ITS#8402) indexing issue
--On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:00 PM +0000 email@example.com wrote:
> Mail system message that raised the alarm:
> Reporting-MTA: dns; mail01.xxxx.xx
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 24C5526003F
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; xxxxx at xxx .xy
> Arrival-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:30:34 +0200 (CEST)
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; xxxxx @ xxx .xy
> Original-Recipient: rfc822; xxxxxx at xxx .xy
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1
> Remote-MTA: dns; mail02.xxxx.xx
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <xxxxxxx at xxx .xy >: Recipient address
> rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
>> From my point of view indexing, even if not needed, may never do the
> fail, isn't it?
> But seems something weird happened.
I would note that you reported using a very ancient version of OpenLDAP
(2.4.23, released June 2010). It's possible you encountered a bug that has
long since been fixed. I would advise using a current release of OpenLDAP.
If you still encounter the same issue with indices, then please follow up
to this ITS. In the meantime, this ITS will be closed.
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: