[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#8354) syncprov segv
--On Saturday, January 23, 2016 2:43 PM +0000 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Essentially the same patch as i had (destroyed sop->s_mutex in abandon
> check rather than init later).
> I did place the o_abandon test under the while( si->si_active ) loop
> instead of above just to ensure the check is under the same lock hold
> as the list modification.
> Ill grab whats in git and start tests on monday
Are you able to confirm if the fix is good? I'm working on 2.4.44, and
want to be sure this fix is included.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration