[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#8354) syncprov segv
Thomas Pressnell wrote:
> Essentially the same patch as i had (destroyed sop->s_mutex in abandon
> check rather than init later).
> I did place the o_abandon test under the while( si->si_active ) loop
> instead of above just to ensure the check is under the same lock hold
> as the list modification.
Ah good point. Yeah, I'll move the check down.
> Ill grab whats in git and start tests on monday
> Have a good weekend
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/