[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#8354) syncprov segv

Thomas Pressnell wrote:
> Thanks,
> Essentially the same patch as i had (destroyed sop->s_mutex in abandon
> check rather than init later).
> I did place the o_abandon test under the while( si->si_active ) loop
> instead of above just to ensure the check is under the same lock hold
> as the list modification.

Ah good point. Yeah, I'll move the check down.
> Ill grab whats in git and start tests on monday
> Have a good weekend
> Tom

   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/