Re: (ITS#8054) Operation duration logging

[clem.oudot@gmail.com]

2015-02-11 18:33 GMT+01:00  <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>:
> On 11. feb. 2015 12:38, Michael Str=C3=B6der wrote:
>> h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:
>>> Cool feture, but please use fewer characteres in the already
>>> bloated log.  How about "time=3D<integer>us" or even omit the "us"?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> But 'time' sounds a bit general.
>> How about 'tdu' or even 'td' as abbreviation for "time duration"?
>
> I don't think so. You can't see from that what it means unless you
> already know, so you have to look it up just to see if you're
> interested.  'time' you can decide to look up if you are interested.
>

Seems other LDAP servers have choosen 'etime' (see
http://ludopoitou.com/2015/02/24/about-auditing-ldap-operations/). Why
not try to use the same word?


Cl=C3=A9ment OUDOT.