[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#8013) SIGSEGV in test_filter()
> Leonid Yuriev wrote:
>> 04.01.2015 02:47, Howard Chu wrote:
>>> The patch is wrong. syncprov_matchops can be called twice for the same
>>> operation; toggling the flag where you've placed it means the filter
>>> will be incorrect on the 2nd invocation as well as on all subsequent
>> Ok, but found another case.
>> The ss->s_op->ors_filter may be updated immediately after the s_mutex
> Seems like the simpler fix then is to keep the mutex held until after
> test_filter finishes.
Fixed in master.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/