Re: (ITS#7458) No matching rules for attribute mailPreferenceOption

[jonas.d.lindstrom@ericsson.com]

Yes, you are right of course. And thanks for the tip about forcing a 
matching rule, it works fine.

/JL

On 2012-12-04 02:29, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Monday, December 03, 2012 9:06 AM +0000 
> jonas.d.lindstrom@ericsson.com wrote:
>
>> Full_Name: Jonas Lindstr?m
>> Version: 2.4.33
>> OS: Linux
>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>> Submission from: (NULL) (194.237.142.6)
>>
>>
>> The attribute mailPreferenceOption in the cosine schema is defined
>> without any matching rules, so filters such as (mailPreferenceOption=0)
>> fail.
>
> Core schema are defined by RFCs.  If the RFC defines no matching rule, 
> then there isn't one in the schema.  If you want to see this changed, 
> I advise filing an RFC to update the schema definition. For this 
> particular attribute, see <https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1274.txt>
>
> You can, of course, force matching rules for your search.  See the 
> slapcat manpage for examples of how to force matching rules.
>
> --Quanah
>
>
> -- 
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sr. Member of Technical Staff
> Zimbra, Inc
> A Division of VMware, Inc.
> --------------------
> Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration