[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#7367) [PATCH] MozNSS: update list of supported cipher suites
- To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: (ITS#7367) [PATCH] MozNSS: update list of supported cipher suites
- From: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:25:00 GMT
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated (OpenLDAP-ITS)
--On Monday, October 08, 2012 9:49 AM +0200 Jan VÄ?elÃ¡k
> I would like to see newer OpenLDAP in RHEL because it would be easier for
> me to maintain it. But I'm not sure if the advantages will outweight the
> disadvantages and if our customers will benefit from it rather than be
> forced to deal with new problems.
The lack of a current version of OpenLDAP exposes your customers to
numerous significant issues, whether or not you choose acknowledge that.
>> Ok. One thing I do with Debian is help triage issues that are reported
>> there with the upstream ITS system if the issues do not appear to be due
>> to the usage of an old version. If there is a simple way to do that
>> with Red Hat, I could help there as well.
> When there is a new bug report, I usualy try to reproduce with the
> package from RHEL or Fedora. And then with the newest OpenLDAP from git
> master. If I'm able to reproduce, I always create a report in your ITS.
I was curious more in a list like pkg-openldap-devel w/ Debian, which also
gets cc'd on all ldap related tickets. But it sounds like you are already
doing what I was thinking of.
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration