[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint



--On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:41 AM +0000 jsynacek@redhat.com wrote:

> On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Str?der wrote:
>> Jan Synacek wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael@stroeder.com wrote:
>>>> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a
>>>> patch for ITS#7168.
>>>
>>> This works for me:
>>>
>>> slapd.ldif:
>>> ...
>>> dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config
>>> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig
>>> objectClass: olcConstraintConfig
>>> olcOverlay: constraint
>>> olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3
>>> olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2
>>> ...
>>
>> From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint.
>>
>> Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or
>> URL-based constraints.
>>
>> The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm
>> slapo-constraint quite heavily.
>>
>> Ciao, Michael.
>>
>
> I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me.
>
> Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the
> patch. Thank you.

Hi Michael,

Have you had any luck in providing a configuration that doesn't work to 
Jan, so this can be resolved?

Thanks,
Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration