Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint

[jsynacek@redhat.com]

On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Jan Synacek wrote:
>> On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael@stroeder.com wrote:
>>> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for
>>> ITS#7168.
>>
>> This works for me:
>>
>> slapd.ldif:
>> ...
>> dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config
>> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig
>> objectClass: olcConstraintConfig
>> olcOverlay: constraint
>> olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3
>> olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2
>> ...
> 
> From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint.
> 
> Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or
> URL-based constraints.
> 
> The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-constraint
> quite heavily.
> 
> Ciao, Michael.
> 

I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me.

Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the
patch. Thank you.

-- 
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat