[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#7169) When using protocol address, port parameter is ignored on connect
- To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: (ITS#7169) When using protocol address, port parameter is ignored on connect
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:17:33 GMT
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated (OpenLDAP-ITS)
--On Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:02 PM +0000 email@example.com wrote:
> Full_Name: Marcel Esser
> Version: 2.4
> OS: Ubuntu Lucid
> URL: http://pastebin.com/TzNGmUCL
> Submission from: (NULL) (220.127.116.11)
> When passing a protocol address (i.e. "ldap://127.0.0.1" instead of a
> plain hostname/IP address, i.e. "127.0.0.1" to libldap, connect seems to
> ignore the port number parameter and always use 389/636 instead.
> Issue with libldap 2.4 on Ubuntu Lucid. Note that in the example below,
> the PHP wrapper for libldap passes the strings on to the library
> unmodified. Detail system information is at the bottom. Linked against
I don't see a bug here. You are using two different methods:
1) The first method is using a URI. A URI includes the port, or defaults
to 389/636, depending on the URI protocol. For example, ldap://127.0.0.1
is treated as ldap://127.0.0.1:389. If you want to use a URI with a
different port, then include the port as part of the URI.
2) The second method is composed of a hostname/IP address, and a port.
Since it is not a URI, these two separate pieces are required to be passed
Essentially, if you are going to use a URI, then use it correctly and pass
in the port as a part of the URI string. Passing in a URI with a separate
port parameter that is not part of the URI is not valid.
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration