[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#7144) reproducible segfault on slave/consumer during sync-replication

Um 01:00 Uhr am 01.02.12 schrieb Howard Chu:
> Sven Hartge wrote:
>> On 02/01/12 05:56, Howard Chu wrote:
>>> sven@svenhartge.de wrote:
>> > > I get a very good backtrace, but since this backtrace contains internal
>> > > information I am a bit hesitant to attach this backtrace to a public
>> > > bug-report.
>> > 
>> > The backtrace you sent shows the crash at a line of code which was
>> > already patched in RE24 due to ITS#7132. I believe this bug is already
>> > fixed.
>> This is good news. Do you have any commit ID so I can try to backport
>> this fix to the version currently in Debian Squeeze?
> commit 42faa8393e6cd41a837b526777110b892541773a

This simple patch applies flawless on 2.4.23 but still segfaults. Will try 
on top of 2.4.28 tomorrow, backtraces will follow then, after I verified 
my findings.

(Reason for trying this on top of 2.4.23 is because this is the version in 
Debian Squeeze and I want to provide the DDs with a fix for Squeeze. I 
fully understand that is not supported by OpenLDAP.)