[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#5048) Suspicious use of 'unchecked' limit syncprov
- To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: (ITS#5048) Suspicious use of 'unchecked' limit syncprov
- From: hyc@symas.com
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:34:54 GMT
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated (OpenLDAP-ITS)
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> hyc@symas.com writes:
>> Wrong. AdminLimitExceeded ONLY means unchecked here. Otherwise it would be
>> SizeLimitExceeded (or TimeLimitExceeded).
>
> Okay. Took me some digging to see that. Anyway, the main problem is
> that hitting the unchecked limit does not imply there is an entry which
> even approximately matches the filter. Not without indexes.
>
I guess that's a fair point, but operating without an entryCSN index would be
a config mistake anyway. (Note that the unchecked limit only has relevance on
backends that support indexing in the first place.)
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/