[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6773) Per-connection extra stuff
> I think we can live without this feature. E.g., ppolicy, sssvlv etc. all
> create their own private arrays of per-conn structures. Sharing here will
> require introducing another mutex.
Right, I've fixed things differently. I note that other code (e.g. paged
results) is write-accessing its state without mutex protection; although
it is unlikely that more than one search operation use paged response
concurrently, this is incorrect in principle.
I'm closing this ITS.