masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote: > h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote: >> Hopefully fixed with the latest ITS#6632/6720 commits. > > You mean ITS#6727, I guess. I fixed ITS#6720 (rwm.c 1.132 -> 1.133), > it looked unrelated. For me, ITS#6727 is now fixed with your patch. > Can you confirm, Michael? 30 test iterations without problems. Seems to be fixed now. Ciao, Michael.