[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6621) Compile time error in daemon.c 1.446
- To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: (ITS#6621) Compile time error in daemon.c 1.446
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:50:33 GMT
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated (OpenLDAP-ITS)
Doug Leavitt wrote:
> I have been testing pretty consistently on Solaris this year,
> most recent on HEAD versus RELEASE. thats how I noticed
> the ITS 6621 issue.
> I may be able to do some specific testing on specific hardware
> platforms, depending on what is desired, and what I can get
> access to. I do regulary test on both x86 and sparc platforms.
> Also, I now have Oracle legal permission to pass OpenLDAP
> enhancements and fixes upstream.
> I am almost ready to submit a proposed patch to libldap to deliver
> a revised version of draft-zeilenga-ldap-c-api-concurrency-00.txt
> functionality for OpenLDAP libldap.
> My proposed patch so far implements the ldap_dup and
> ldap_destroy portions of the specification, but I have not
> yet implemented the LDAP_OPT_SESSION_REFCNT or
> added any LDAP_API_FEATURE* style macros.
> I would like some guidance if/what macros in ldap.h are desired.
> I am working on the assumption that some public discussion
> and peer review will be expected before any patch submission
> would be accepted.
> Should I start with a discussion on openldap-technical first? Other?
Sounds very interesting; discussions of this nature (modifications to OpenLDAP
code) are most appropriate for the -devel list. Looking forward to continuing
this conversation there.
> On 08/12/10 06:21 PM, email@example.com wrote:
>> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> Blind-fixed in HEAD. Thanks, p.
>> By the way Ando, any more ideas about the devpoll implementation? Have you
>> tested it against select on Solaris recently?
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/