[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6151) Update cosine.schema to RFC 4524
On Apr 22, 2010, at 1:34 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>> obsoletes !=3D OBSOLETE, so no. That is, the meaning of the term
>> 'obsolete' is quite different in these two contexts.
>> The latter context the term is defined as follows: The OBSOLETE =
>> present, indicates the element is not active.
> I agree that OBSOLETE should not be set in this case.
>> For user application attribute types, whether the type is active or =
>> I think, best left to the schema administrator.
> Who is the schema administrator?
Generally speaking, the OpenLDAP admin administrates which schema =
elements to load into the schema and whether each such element is active =
While in some cases a schema admin might design schema elements, I =
consider schema admin and schema element designer to be two separate =
> I'm nitpicking here because on the OpenLDAP
> lists we all keep telling OpenLDAP admins not to mess with the =
> at all.
We often advise admins to load various schema elements into their =
schemas. We generally assume admins run have only active elements in =
the their schema as the need for inactive elements can generally be =
When at I say "don't mess with standard schema elements", what I mean is =
don't change aspects of schema specifications which are consider per the =
technical specifications to be immutable on published in a technical =
specification (or otherwise broadly published). There certainly are =
other changes one can make to standard schema elements without violating =
the technical specifications (e.g., changing the DESC value), and if =
such case were to arise more generally, I might be more precise in my =
general advice. That is, I rather only raise exceptions in advice when =
it's actually applicable to the situation raised by the admin.