[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6151) Update cosine.schema to RFC 4524
On Apr 21, 2010, at 6:03 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>>> On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:30 AM, email@example.com wrote:
>>>> Updated schema file cosine-update.schema attached.
>>> I note that differs are generally preferred, even where the file is
>>> mostly changed. This helps ensure changes that others might make to =
>>> file you started with are not lost.
>> I thought about sending a diff but the file in this form is more
>> readable for easy review. Could someone please look at it whether =
>> Another approach would be to have two schema files, one which only
>> contains the schema descriptions from RFC 4524 and one with the =
>> schema descriptions from RFC 1274 with the latter obviously being
>> dependent on the former.
> I have one preliminary question for Kurt: since rfc4524 obsoletes =
> should those schema items that were not brought forward be marked as
obsoletes !=3D OBSOLETE, so no. That is, the meaning of the term =
'obsolete' is quite different in these two contexts.
The latter context the term is defined as follows:
The OBSOLETE field, if present, indicates the element is not active.
For user application attribute types, whether the type is active or not =
is, I think, best left to the schema administrator. (Update operations =
upon an inactive element is limited to removal of the element.)
> If yes, then all schema could fit in one file. I'd like a
> clear way to separate valid from obsolete schema. The obsolete items
> should be available for backwards compatibility. As an alternative, =
> like to have a "slim" (without obsolete) and a complete version of the
I rather no element be specified in multiple files.
> Could you please upload the file? Through the ITS attachments
> don't work too well.
>>>> IPR notice:
>>>> This patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software and RFC 4524 and =
>>>> 1274. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in =
>>>> attached file were developed by Michael Str=F6der =
>>>> I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any =
>>> While this notice of origin is fine, you did not include a rights
>> I, Michael Str=F6der, hereby place the modified schema file =
>> attached to ITS#6151 (and only these modifications) into the public
>> domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or
>> redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or =
> Am I right in assuming this IPR is fine? Thanks, p.
Yes. - Kurt