[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6466) certificateListValidate rejects valid X.509 CRLs (but not RFC-compliant)
>> BTW, what do you mean by "needs some thought" (in the ticket notes)?
> I hadn't decided yet if slapd should log a warning for this or not.
A warning, to be useful, should allow to clearly identify the broken
piece of data. Where the issue is identified, there's no way to find
out the DN of the entry that contains the datum. All you could use is
the certificate's content (e.g. issuer DN and so); not sure how helpful
it would be.