[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ITS#6423 slapo-rwm and dynlist overlay
masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:
> The problem is that back-relay presents slapo-rwm(3) an entry with both
> REP_ENTRY_MODIFIABLE and REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE flags set. As a
> consequence, the entry is released (namely, freed) before it is returned
> by the frontend. As far as I understand, the two flags should be mutually
> exclusive. As soon as one entry is marked as REP_ENTRY_MODIFIABLE, it is
> supposed to be a copy of an entry that may need to be released, or an
> entry created from scratch and thus not stored anywhere. I have a quick
> fix to your problem, that consists in ignoring REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE when
> REP_ENTRY_MODIFIABLE is also set. However, a better fix would consist in
> tracking where the issue occurs. Unless I track it, I'll commit the quick
> fix.
We already have ITS#5340 for issues with these flags...
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/