[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6215) liblber problems
>On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:16 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> - decode.c is quite lax about what it accepts. Should we tighten
>>> that when feasible, or remain "liberal in what we accept"?
> Decoding needs to be liberal here. Otherwise interoperability will
> suffer as it is well established that there exists many
> implementations which are not strict in what they send.
ITS done, then.