[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6243) back-monitor fails to report entry cache usage
--On August 5, 2009 7:17:43 PM +0000 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> This may be specific to glued databases (databases rooted at "").
> The problem could be partially addressed by telling back-bdb (who's
> maintaining this data in the monitor backend) to check subordinates as
> soon as it discovers it's a glue instance. However, this poses two
> different problems:
> - is the aggregate information resulting from adding all glued databases
> cache usage still useful?
> - what happens if heterogeneous databases are glued? Significantly, what
> if the superior database is not bdb/hdb?
> Probably, the monitor database should also present subordinate databases
> as separate entries.
Interestingly, in my case, there's only one real database in play for the
glue as it is, since it's rooted at "". All other database definitions
come before it (cn=config, cn=accesslog, cn=monitor).
I'm also curious why back-monitor develops stats for the other caches but
specifically not for entry cache.
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration