Re: (ITS#6232) OpenLDAP 2.4.17 fails to compile with --with-tls=gnutls

[hyc@symas.com]

steffen.hau@rz.uni-mannheim.de wrote:
> Full_Name: Steffen Hau
> Version: 2.4.17
> OS: gentoo
> URL:
> Submission from: (NULL) (134.155.35.13)
>
>
> Gentoo prefers gnutls usage over openssl when compiling openldap. But if
> with-tls=gnutls and enable-lmpasswd set, neither HAVE_OPENSSL nor NAVE_MOZNSS is
> defined and passwd.c failes to compile with:

See ITS #4997. There is a patch for this in the debian bug tracker, but until 
someone with appropriate authorization (i.e., the patch author) contributes it 
to the ITS with the requisite Rights statements attached, we cannot 
incorporate it.

> passwd.c:813: error: expected declaration specifiers or ?...? before ?des_key?
> passwd.c: In function ?lmPasswd_to_key?:
> passwd.c:828: error: ?key? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:828: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> passwd.c:828: error: for each function it appears in.)
> passwd.c: In function ?chk_lanman?:
> passwd.c:839: error: ?des_key? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:839: error: expected ?;? before ?key?
> passwd.c:840: error: ?des_context? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:840: error: expected ?;? before ?schedule?
> passwd.c:841: error: ?des_data_block? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:841: error: expected ?;? before ?StdText?
> passwd.c:842: error: expected ?;? before ?PasswordHash1?
> passwd.c:859: error: ?key? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:859: error: too many arguments to function ?lmPasswd_to_key?
> passwd.c:860: error: ?schedule? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:861: error: ?StdText? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:861: error: ?PasswordHash1? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:861: error: ?DES_ENCRYPT? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:867: error: too many arguments to function ?lmPasswd_to_key?
> passwd.c:869: error: ?PasswordHash2? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c: In function ?hash_lanman?:
> passwd.c:1135: error: ?des_key? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1135: error: expected ?;? before ?key?
> passwd.c:1136: error: ?des_context? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1136: error: expected ?;? before ?schedule?
> passwd.c:1137: error: ?des_data_block? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1137: error: expected ?;? before ?StdText?
> passwd.c:1138: error: expected ?;? before ?PasswordHash1?
> passwd.c:1155: error: ?key? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1155: error: too many arguments to function ?lmPasswd_to_key?
> passwd.c:1156: error: ?schedule? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1157: error: ?StdText? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1157: error: ?PasswordHash1? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1157: error: ?DES_ENCRYPT? undeclared (first use in this function)
> passwd.c:1159: error: too many arguments to function ?lmPasswd_to_key?
> passwd.c:1161: error: ?PasswordHash2? undeclared (first use in this function)
> make[2]: *** [passwd.o] Error 1
>
> I took a look in the passwd.c file, and because of neither HAVE_OPENSSL nor
> HAVE_MOZNSS is defined, des_key isn't defined also. There is already a check in
> the configure script, if tls is set when lmpasswd is set. The failure message
> for it explains, that there has to be openssl installed in order to use lm
> passwords. Perhaps this test has to be changed in a manner that it's checked,
> what implementation is used for tls, and only activates lm passwords only, if
> tls is either openssl or moznss.
>
> Please let me know if you need further information.
>
> Best regards,
> Steffen Hau
>


-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/