[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6096) 2.4.16 replica segfault
> email@example.com wrote:
>> firstname.lastname@example.org ha scritto:
>>> Good idea.
>>> Also, I think the original LDAP message should still be intact, in frame 6
>>> "msg" - perhaps you can extract the DN that was actually received and figure
>>> out why it had a problem.
>> This is the msg from frame 6
>> (gdb) p msg->lm_ber->ber_buf@100
>> $4 =
> The second '\000' after '\004' (octet string) was probably put by
> ber_scanf("m") to terminate the string, but the first one seems to be
> the length of the octet string! So apparently the message actually
> contained an empty DN, which makes little sense. Could the error be at
> the provider's side?
It certainly looks that way. What version is the provider, what version is the
consumer? You only said there were mixed versions before, you never specified
which was which.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/