[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#6009) test019: test failed - master and R2 slave databases differ

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Monday, March 09, 2009 3:24 PM +0000 michael@stroeder.com wrote:
>> michael@stroeder.com wrote:
>>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der
>>> Version: RE24
>> Seems to work in HEAD on the very same system.
> RE24 is not ready for testing yet.

Well, Howard recently recommended to use it (see below). So I'm testing
as usual...

Ciao, Michael.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: RE24 (2.4.15) slapd consuming large amounts of CPU
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:47:57 -0800
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
To: John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net>
CC: openldap-software@openldap.org
References: <20090304185521.GA3184@boost.horde.net>
<49AEE757.3000502@symas.com>	<20090306141020.GA7876@boost.horde.net>

John Morrissey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:40:55PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
>> John Morrissey wrote:
>>> A backtrace (below) shows many threads waiting on a mutex in
>>> bdb_cache_*().
>> From the trace it looks similar to ITS#5860. The patches for this
>> are in HEAD, not yet released.
> With an shm_key, slapd CPU consumption dropped noticably and has been
>  running long enough to make the leak apparent.
> Since this second-round fix for ITS#5860 has been merged into RE24,
> do you recommend running that, or should I cherry-pick
> 1.120.2.{21,22} into our local packaging?

At this point I would just use RE24. Unless any new critical bugs show
up in the next few days, it's very likely what will be 2.4.16.

  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/