[Date Prev][Date Next]
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
>> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> If it works, then we still have an issue: operations for "o=1,o=2" will
>>> probably be intercepted by the back-bdb. However, I understand that
>>> since the first database is glued, it wants to know whom it's glued to.
>> A fix is in HEAD. It will allow this scenario to succeed, but it will
>> also allow completely broken subordinate configs to be dynamically
>> created in cn=config. (configs read from slapd.conf/slapd.d will still
>> be error checked appropriately.) As such, it needs a bit more thought.
> Need ldap-txn, don't we?
I guess that could help. We haven't figured out yet how to propagate TXNs in
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/