[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Docs: admin guide describes log levels inconsistently (ITS#5904)
Ok, but wouldn't that detail be best served staying in the man page? I
mean, what "user" will want to enter hex for loglevels?
I'll make the same anyway.
On 05/02/2009, firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> wrote:
> --On Thursday, February 05, 2009 11:41 AM +0000 ghenry@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
>> Awww, aren't we nice! ;-)
>> Patch applied,
> The new patch is definitely an improvement, however it fails to document
> the hexadecimal notation for log levels, which is also perfectly valid.
> See slapd.conf(5):
> 1 (0x1 trace) trace function calls
> 2 (0x2 packets) debug packet handling
> 4 (0x4 args) heavy trace debugging (function args)
> and the description therein:
> The desired log level can be input as a single integer that
> combines the (ORed) desired levels, both in decimal or in
> hexadecimal notation, as a list of integers (that are ORed
> internally), or as a list of the names that are shown between
> brackets, such that
> loglevel 129
> loglevel 0x81
> loglevel 128 1
> loglevel 0x80 0x1
> loglevel acl trace
> are equivalent.
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Engineer
> Zimbra, Inc
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
Sent from my mobile device