[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5540) Normalization assertion in attr.c
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Sean Burford<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> namingContexts was the trickiest, since RFC 4512 defines it without an
>> equality matching rule but monitor_back_register_database() compares
>> it with backend suffixes. It has to deal with capitalised values
>> properly otherwise we end up with duplicate namingContexts entries, so
>> normalization is required.
> I have uploaded
> which adds a test for various things under cn=monitor. If duplicate
> namingContexts creep in (as mentioned above) it detects that.
> The duplicate naming contexts thing was fixed by comparing a_vals with
> be_suffix, I just wrote the test since there was no existing
> cn=monitor test.
Sorry for dropping the ball on this. These last two patches are now committed
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/