[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#5860) slapd memeory leak under openldap 2.4
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:23 PM -0800 Rodrigo Costa
<rlvcosta@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Quanah,
>
> My initial attempt was using openldap2.4.11 since this is the stable
> version. At this version Berkeley DB 4.7 isn't supported and then I used
> the BDB 4.6 with all patches.
I hardly consider 2.4.11 stable, regardless of what the tag is. I would
advise trying something more current (such as 2.4.13). And with BDB 4.7 +
patches.
> At this configuration, having the DB_CONFIG setup for 50MB, and even
> having the idlcache and cache sizes defined I continue to see the memory
> being allocated and never released by slapd.
What about dncachesize as well?
> 2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 where the CentOS5.4 uses a built-in backend library for
> BDB4.4.
If you are looking for stability, I would hardly go with the crappy release
CentOS ships. The final 2.3 release was 2.3.43. Use it instead if you
want to use 2.3.
Also, are you on a 32 or 64-bit system? I certainly have no problems going
over 3GB on my 64-bit systems.
For example:
[zimbra@ldap openldap-data]$ du -c -h *.bdb
1.1G cn.bdb
564M displayName.bdb
702M dn2id.bdb
158M entryCSN.bdb
122M entryUUID.bdb
335M givenName.bdb
6.5G id2entry.bdb
1.1G mail.bdb
5.5M objectClass.bdb
855M sn.bdb
121M uid.bdb
8.0K zimbraDomainName.bdb
122M zimbraId.bdb
20K zimbraMailAlias.bdb
1.1G zimbraMailDeliveryAddress.bdb
2.1M zimbraMailForwardingAddress.bdb
3.1M zimbraMailTransport.bdb
8.0K zimbraVirtualHostname.bdb
8.0K zimbraVirtualIPAddress.bdb
13G total
DB is 13GB in size.
[zimbra@ldap openldap-data]$ cat DB_CONFIG
set_cachesize 8 0 2
set_lg_regionmax 262144
set_lg_bsize 2097152
set_lk_max_locks 1500
set_flags DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE
set_lg_dir /var/log/zimbra-ldap-journals
Process size:
8447 zimbra 17 0 9.9g 8.9g 8.1g S 34 57.5 39:20.57 slapd
Using OpenLDAP 2.3.42.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration