[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5809) syncrepl + back-ldif + "rename to same DN" fails
Pierangelo Masarati writes:
> I think ITS#5326 is related. Namely, write operations (add, rename)
> should always rebuild the (new)DN hierarchically from the tree.
I'm not sure what exactly the problem is, if any:-) Syncrepl itself
needs to handle databases that are not that nice: We can't require
that of back-perl, nor back-ldap which accesses a non-OpenLDAP server
(if that makes any sense). And syncrepl + rwm, maybe? Also syncrepl
is an RFC (4533) so it should handle non-OpenLDAP peers.
Still, if it keeps OpenLDAP-on-OpenLDAP clean, that's a plus.
Unless we want back-ldif to be different just to test that syncrepl
handles different backends. Might also make a test which replicates
between different backends - e.g. $BACKEND and back-ldif.