[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5809) syncrepl + back-ldif + "rename to same DN" fails
> Full_Name: Hallvard B Furuseth
> Version: HEAD
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (126.96.36.199)
> Submitted by: hallvard
> With the latest back-ldif/ldif.c (rev 1.99),
> ./run -b ldif test048-syncrepl-multiproxy
> breaks with "master and P1 slave databases differ" and
> ./run -b ldif test018-syncreplication-persist
> when patched to not reject $BACKEND = ldif
> breaks with "producer and consumer databases differ".
> The offender is "rename to same DN" (ITS#5319), i.e. rev 1.99.
> Unless there is a big "duh!" in it, it exposed a syncrepl bug.
Yes, thanks. The consumer assumed that an entry being renamed would have no
other modifications associated with it. This assumption is wrong. There are no
rename ops in test018, but apparently back-ldif is not returning the RDN with
the same case as the original entry, so syncrepl assumes a rename (that only
changed letter case) was done.
Still looking at the fix.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/