[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#5758) NO-OP control criticality

ando@sys-net.it writes:
> The latest draft I can find (14 February 2007) states that
>                                                Clients MUST provide a
>   criticality value of TRUE to prevent unintended modification of the
>   directory.
> As a consequence, I think the server could reject instances of this control
> with a criticality of FALSE, to prevent its unintended use.

RFC 2251 allowed that (or could be read as alllowing it), but
RFC 4511 deliberately does not, after long discussions on ldapbis.