[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5656) Bind operations with translucent overlay
----- firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> ghenry@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
> > Too tired today :-( For some reason I was talking about
> slapo-unique, as I'm
> > writing that up just now.
> Just to avoid (or increase :) confusion when you'll be back from
> I don't recall working at slapo-unique recently. AFAIK, the old and
> new config statements live together in perfect harmony, although
> unique_uri is preferable as it is more expressive.
> I have added a restrict=<uri> parameter to slapo-constraint, which
> allows to optionally restrict the entries the constraint would apply
> I have also allowed the <attr> to actually be an attribute list, in
> one needs to apply the same constraint to more than one. Finally, the
> "set" type is now available. It uses the ACL sets' syntax, which,
> AFAIK, is still undocumented.
Again, thanks. Sets have been documentated for quite some time now:
OpenLDAP Engineering Team.
Community developed LDAP software.