[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5662) Comments in schema declarations separated by semicolon
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:57 AM, email@example.com wrote:
>> Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>>> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>>>> email@example.com wrote:
>>>>> Who benefits from this feature?
>>>> An admin copying&pasting a schema from an standard document which uses
>>>> this format. I'm currently looking at such a document with ~500
>>>> occurences of OIDs used in declarations instead of NAMEs.
>>> Which one? It's not RFC 4512 format. RFC 4512 uses ';' for comments
>>> _about_ the syntax of schema elements, not _in_ their syntax.
> There is a lot of crap in I-Ds, and even some crap in RFCs.
That's why I was asking whether it's feasible to be liberal in what you
receive (read from config) but to be strict in what you send (add to the