[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5639) Digital (PGP-)signature for downloadable sources
>On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:06 PM, email@example.com wrote:
>> Kurt@OpenLDAP.org writes:
>>> I note as well that properly deploying release signing requires
>>> more than script modification. For instance, one does need to
>>> consider that the host to sign the releases might itself been
>>> taken over and the implications of such a takeover.
>> For that part, signatures in the 'https:' site would help.
> I think you need to re-think that assertion.
Er, yes, I was thinking of the "outside" equivalent, hacking DNS and
"taking over" that way. I have the impression that's the most common
way to "take over" a site, but I may be wrong.