[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5639) Digital (PGP-)signature for downloadable sources
On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:06 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Kurt@OpenLDAP.org writes:
>> I note as well that properly deploying release signing requires
>> more than script modification. For instance, one does need to
>> consider that the host to sign the releases might itself been
>> taken over and the implications of such a takeover.
> For that part, signatures in the 'https:' site would help.
I think you need to re-think that assertion.
> Not that I'm making an issue of it, I've got OpenLDAP installations
> that I didn't verify against any signature right on this host.