[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5639) Digital (PGP-)signature for downloadable sources
> I note as well that properly deploying release signing requires
> more than script modification. For instance, one does need to
> consider that the host to sign the releases might itself been
> taken over and the implications of such a takeover.
For that part, signatures in the 'https:' site would help. Not
that I'm making an issue of it, I've got OpenLDAP installations
that I didn't verify against any signature right on this host.