[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5500) comments in cn=config entries
>> However the attribute for general notes ('info') should probably be
>> treated as X-ORDERED 'VALUES', I haven't checked if it's inconvenient
>> to do that with a preexisting attribute without that feature. The
>> valsort overlay does, but I don' suggest to require valsort.
> The X-ORDERED flag obviously cannot be added to existing schema
That's why I said "treated as" X-ORDERED (when occurring in cn=config).
If that's too cumbersome though:
> you need to define a new attribute.
An attribute private to OpenLDAP should have a prefix like "olc",
but an RFCed attribute must wait till (X-)ORDERED is standardized.
I suggest "olc-note", then. Still stands out from the rest since the
others do not use hyphens, and also sorts it before the other "olc"s.