[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5339) wrong referral from back-bdb
> Full_Name: Hallvard B Furuseth
> Version: HEAD
> Submission from: (NULL) (220.127.116.11)
> Submitted by: hallvard
> If a referral object's "ref" DN differs from the entry DN, and
> you update a subordinate of the referral object, the DN part
> of the referral from back-bdb is wrong.
> bash$ cat ref.ldif
> dn: o=we
> o: we
> ref: ldap://elsewhere/o=they
> objectClass: referral
> objectClass: extensibleObject
> dn: cn=me,o=we
> cn: me
> objectClass: organizationalRole
> bash$ ldapadd ...< ref.ldif
> adding new entry "o=we"
> adding new entry "cn=me,o=we"
> ldap_add: Referral (10)
> matched DN: o=we
> It works if NULL is changed to&e->e_name at back-bdb/referral.c line 96:
> rs->sr_ref = referral_rewrite( ref, NULL,
> &op->o_req_dn, LDAP_SCOPE_DEFAULT );
> I don't quite understand that function though:
> Why does it use default_referral (slapd.conf 'referral')? That is for
> use when no local backend database handles the operation, which I would
> think means no database's be_chk_referrals() gets be called. And indeed
> the function uses it if
> !be_issuffix( op->o_bd,&op->o_req_ndn )
> which looks to me like a test for whether this function is _not_ to be
> called for this database.
I've never understood that function either. ;) It seems completely
unnecessary, since the individual operations' code also does referral checks.
Can you try testing with be_chk_referrals NULL'd out?
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/