[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5265) back-ldif flunks test004-modify
Pierangelo Masarati writes:
> works for me (in HEAD)
For me too. Likely you fixed it with ldapdelete.
However now HEAD run -b ldif test011-glue-slapadd fails with differently
sorted entries: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com is out of place.
>> test025-limits [didn't bump into server-side unchecked limit]
> no notion of "unckecked" (should walk the tree to find out how many
> entries are there...)
Or backends could count down from sizelimit.unchecked while examining
and returning entries/referrals. Then fail with adminLimitExceeded if
they reach zero.
Is it OK to return entries followed by adminLimitExceeded? I don't see
any protest in the LDAP RFCs, but I remember vaguely that the code may
be mimicing X.500 errors which should not be combined with result
entries. (I'll need to reread X.500 soon, it's been too long...)