[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5028) incomplete slapcat docs
> <quote who="email@example.com">
>> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>>> email@example.com wrote:
>>>> The slapcat man page says in the Limitations section:
>>>> In general, your slapd(8) should not be running (at least, not
>>>> read-write mode) when you do this to ensure consistency of the
>>> Given that back-ldbm has been deleted for 2.4, I guess we can just
>>> delete this sentence.
>> It could produce garbage data with back-ldif, and with some foreign
>> database module. I think it should say it's safe with bdb (and null).
>> Could copy it to the slapd-bdb(5) too. (I don't suggest to make
>> slapcat(8) refer the user to that, since there is only one example
> Obviously hdb too. Would it produce garbage on 2.4?
Do we want to do anything with this for .37?