[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)

ghenry@suretecsystems.com wrote:

> Depends on the time you have I suppose.
> I presume this isn't the case in 2.4?
> If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4?

Referring people to 2.4 really isn't nice unless we have an actual release to 
refer them to. Which is another reason we need to get a 2.4 beta out ASAP. 
Since it looks like no activity has occurred on closing out the remaining devel 
ITSs perhaps we should just freeze the current tree and roll out 2.4.5 as-is.
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/