[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5028) incomplete slapcat docs
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>> email@example.com wrote:
>>> The slapcat man page says in the Limitations section:
>>> In general, your slapd(8) should not be running (at least, not
>>> read-write mode) when you do this to ensure consistency of the
>> Given that back-ldbm has been deleted for 2.4, I guess we can just
>> delete this sentence.
> It could produce garbage data with back-ldif, and with some foreign
> database module. I think it should say it's safe with bdb (and null).
> Could copy it to the slapd-bdb(5) too. (I don't suggest to make
> slapcat(8) refer the user to that, since there is only one example
Obviously hdb too. Would it produce garbage on 2.4?