[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#4982) link libldap_r explicitly with the threading libraries
Hallvard B Furuseth <email@example.com> writes:
> Hallvard B Furuseth writes:
>> Is this the second half of the Debian patch you posted in ITS#4981 - so
>> it'd be wrong to apply one one of these patches?
> Sorry, "wrong to apply _only_ one of".
> (I.e. does ITS#4981 introduce breakage which ITS#4982 fixes?) Maybe
> everything worked well before we switched to libtool...
No, they should be independent, I think. I believe that the rationale for
4982 is still correct; if you use pthread functions, you need to
explicitly link against the library to avoid getting unversioned
references. Unversioned references will *normally* not cause a problem,
so they're a bit of a time bomb. They keep working fine right up until
the library makes an incompatible change in the data structures, and then
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>