[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#4975) --without-tls is broken
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> I haven't kept track of the TLS changes though, so I don't know if just
>>> moving #ifdefs around is the right fix.
>> As far as I understood it, the rationale of those changes was to be able
>> to handle, and significantly parse certificates, independently of any TLS
>> capability (including when no TLS is available). If you find a
>> combination of #ifdef's that gives this, then it should be the right one.
> Your understanding is correct. I can sort this out if you haven't already.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/