[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#4943) tpool.c pause vs. finish

h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:
> h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no writes:
>> Howard Chu writes:
>>> Since there is only one thread pool in use, it is impossible for another
>>> thread to be active.
>> No.  Though it's true that my concern above was wrong.
>> It is "ltp_active_count--" which triggers the start of a pause.  (...)
> Sorry again, I was confusing 3 problems after two long days.  It's the
> active (unpaused) thread which would be calling _context() of course.
> In any case, thank you for the reply.  I know what to test now...
> Another problem, which I think I'm repeating from an earlier discussion:
> - TID_HASH() fails if several ldap_pvt_thread_t bit patterns can
>   represent the same thread ID, e.g. if it is a struct/integer type with
>   padding bytes/bits.
That doesn't matter, since the table will use linear probing to compare 
thread IDs.

   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/