[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#4938) hdb_db_close SEGVs

I don't have #5 (sleepycat#14657) nor the unofficial 
patch. As for the official one, I'm not sure about its relevance to the 
actual SEGV due to the "recovery...fail" comment. In other words, though 
it may be impacting the ability of alock/db_recover to do its thing, 
that's just a side effect of the unclean shutdown which is the real bug 
here to my view.

The region size patch is interesting, but I will tell you that the 
database in question has

set_cachesize   0 200000000 0

and it (to a glance) looks like that only impacts the gig column, which I 
have as zero anyway.

I can tell you that stop/starts weren't an issue with 2.3.32 and the same 
Sleepycat binaries...not that I stop/start often as a rule of thumb. (I am 
lately; we're implementing ando's {RADIUS} module.) But two identical 
traces on two different boxes caught my eye.

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

> ----- richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu wrote:
>> Full_Name: Aaron RIchton
>> Version: 2.3.35
>> OS: Solaris 9
>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>> Submission from: (NULL) (
>> BDB 4.2.52. I've had a couple (different) machines SEGV on slapd
>> shutdown. Both
>> had identical stack traces:
> Wierd, I've been running hdb on my servers for nearly a year without such an issue.  Did this just start with 2.3.35?
> Also, what patches do you have applied to BDB 4.2.52.  I'm up to 6 now.
> <http://www.stanford.edu/services/directory/openldap/configuration/bdb-build-notes.html>
> 5 are direct from sleepycat:
> <http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/db/update/4.2.52/patch.4.2.52.html>
> with the last one there possibly impacting you if you don't have it?
> --Quanah
> -- 
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Engineer
> Zimbra, Inc
> --------------------
> Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration